Elizabeth Tai

Digital Content Specialist and freelance writer, editor and proofreader based in Adelaide

By

Movie review: Of Gods and Men

The Cistercian monks of Tibehirine in Algeria live a simple life. They worship God in their modest chapel with singing and silent meditation, hold services for the town’s few Christians, listen to the problems of their Muslim neighbours, offer them medical aid and listen to their problems.

They live in harmony with their Muslim neighbours, showing them love instead of judgement. They don’t sell Christianity with cheap slogans or threats like some brassy American preachers. Here, the monks evangelise with love.

When an Islamic fundamentalist group massacres a group of foreign aid workers, their Muslim friends beg them to leave but they refuse, believing that they need to make a stand.

Thoughts: I’ve been discovering so many goodies at the Burnside library, and nothing brings me more joy than foreign movies – a different flavour from the usual loud Hollywood blockbuster.

Sigh, this French movie really makes me think about Malaysia. How fundamentalism threatens to ruin what little harmony we have. The scene in the movie that stood out for me is when a couple of Muslims were talking to Christian, one of the monks, about a Muslim girl being killed for not wearing the hijab.

“God says in the Quran you kill your brother you got to hell. They say they’re religious, they have not read the quran!” said one man.

“The world’s gone mad, Christian.” said an elderly Muslim. ”Where are we going? I don’t know who these people are. Only god knows,” he lamented.

Seriously, he’s echoing our thoughts.

Ultimately, we are all brothers and sisters. So, why the hell are we fighting so hard to make people believe what we believe, live the way we live?

Of Gods and Men

Of God’s and Men is a slow-moving movie;  it’s not filled with gun battles or vampy women. Which is why it’s so jarring when the quiet and serene lives of the monks and their Muslim neighbours are brutally interrupted by senseless violence. In this way the director demonstrates what a sharp contrast there is between true spirituality and religious fanatism.

But lest you think the monks are superhuman, they are fearful and doubt too. As one monk says, “Dying for my faith shouldn’t keep me up nights. Dying here and now does it serve a purpose? .. I don’t get it. Why be martyrs? For God? To be heroes?”

And Christian answers. “We’re martyrs out of love; out of fidelity.”

This movie is based on a true story, by the way. And that makes it all the more sadder – that it really happened.

A touching and moving movie. If we can all live like the monks of Tibehirine, the world would be a much better place.

Rating: B+

By

Movie review: Treasure Inn (2011)

They are probably stunned that no one is laughing.

Gong (Nicholas Tse) and Ba (Nick Cheung) are low-ranking police officers in White Horse City. When a wealthy man’s home is robbed of a precious artifact (“White Jade Goddess of Mercy”) and his family killed, Gong and Ba insinuate themselves into the investigation, which is headed by legendary investigative officer Tit Mo Ching (Kenny Ho, always a delight).

Gong, Ba and two girls they meet along the way – Water Dragon Girl and Fire Dragon Girl – all head to Treasure Inn, where they suspect the killers and thieves will be. However, Tit is not keen to have them meddle in his investigation, and worse, a sandstorm traps all including the culprits in the inn, turning the place into a battlefield.
Treasure Inn sounds like a promising movie, but not when it is turned into a slapstick comedy populated by actors with no comedic timing at all. Water Dragon Girl and Fire Dragon Girl are so annoying you cringe each time they come on screen. And Tse may play the straight man in this one, but his occasional attempts at humour are painful to watch. Stick to action, mate.

The one redeeming thing about Treasure Inn are the action scenes, though you’d get infinitely much more with a Donnie Yen movie. Other than that, this movie is a waste of film, and best forgotten as quickly as possible.

Rating: A dismal but still overly-generous 2 out of 5

This review was originally published in The Star.

By

The King’s Speech

The Duke of York (Colin Firth) is at the end of his rope. Despite seeing numerous specialists over the years, the duke (later King George VI) has not been able to conquer his stammering – horribly inconvenient for a man who has to give a number of public speeches. Then, his wife Elizabeth finds him Lionel Logue Geoffrey Rush), an Australian speech therapist whose unconventional methods rub him the wrong way. Logue is far too familiar: he insists on calling him “Bertie” and prods him to talk about personal matters”.

Now, there’s much buzz about this movie,and I’m here to tell you that it is all deserved. At its heart is the tale of a man who fought hard to overcome a disability. It’s also the story of a lonely, isolated man with nearimpossible responsibilities who forms a lovely friendship with a man very different from him. The movie doesn’t dazzle you with elaborate sets or costumes. It is mostly carried by Firth and Rush, who, due to their sheer talent and screen presence, make this movie such an engaging affair. Inspiring, evocative and simply worth watching. – 5 stars

By

Review: Solomon Kane

Set in Jacobean England where magic is alive and well, our titular hero has spent the better part of his battle-ridden life carving out a fearsome reputation as an evil, mercenary beast. However, after a fearsome encounter with one of the Devil’s servants, Solomon renounces violence and retreats to a monastery. But God, apparently, has other plans for him …

Solomon is told to venture out alone into the lands which are now wrecked by dark magic. There, he meets a kind-hearted, Puritan family who takes him in … and you just know that nothing good will come out of that.

Certainly, no one would accuse Solomon Kane of being a sophisticated movie. But this swords-and-magic flick delivers what it promises: good, but not exactly clean (it is rated 18SX, after all) fun. Warning: you’ll have to endure occasional bouts of groan-worthy dialogue and over-the-top melodrama to get to the fun bits.

Some may complain about the simplicity of the tale, but sometimes we need to take a break from The Hurt Locker-type flicks and enjoy a simple tale about a hero who has to rescue a damsel from an evil sorcerer. It definitely doesn’t hurt that James Purefoy acquits himself very well as the dashing and very cool Solomon Kane (I mean, the man fights with two swords!). And the fight scenes? Brutal poetry.

It’s a pity that this film didn’t receive the promotion that other less entertaining films obtained in spades … (I’m looking at you, Twilight.)

Rating: 3 stars

This article was originally published in The Star.

By

Movie review: Mirrors

I’ve always found mirrors a tad freaky, don’t you? I remember after watching Poltergeist III, I wouldn’t walk past a mirror and if I did, I’d peek warily from the side first, wondering if the monster behind it could see me. Hey, I was pretty young, okay?

Well, Mirrors brought that childhood fear back to the fore. Keifer Sutherland is Ben Carson, a down-and-out cop who takes the worst security guard job on the planet: patrolling a burnt out shell of a shopping mall alone deep into the night.

I don’t know about you, I wouldn’t do it if they pay me a million bucks - the former department store is a horror house; charred mannequins – often lined up on corridors looking like corpses of some grotesque apocalypse - stare sightlessly into the distance, the once plush furnishings are now grey or blackened, and creepily, mirrors reflect it all, multiplying the sight again and again.

You just know that the place is haunted, and  Carson discovers it immediately. In a WTF!! sequence, an agonised shriek pierces the eerie silence, and Carson rushes to help the “woman” … only to discover in the mirror … well, I won’t spoil it for you, but it’s one of the scariest scenes in Mirrors. In fact, the movie has many heart-in-your-throat moments like these. There’s even this HOLYSHIIIIT! moment in a bathtub that made me want to reach for the plastic bag. I spent a good majority of the film with my hands plugged over my eyes and ears.

True, what it lacked in the story department (we’ll get there in a moment), you can rest assured that Mirrors will scare the bejesus out of you.

Read More

By

Movie review: You Don’t Mess with the Zohan

It really goes to show how much I love my friends. For them, I’ll endure anything, even watching a movie that I know would make me want to rip the theatre screen to shreds.

The movie actually started out promisingly with enough gags to get me chuckling. Mossad super spy Zohan just wants to cut hair, but the Israeli government wants him to hunt down terrorists. Several bad p*nis jokes later, he fakes his own death and heads off to New York to be a stylist. He couldn’t get a job at first, but finds his niche in a salon run by a Palestinian woman in a Middle Eastern neighbourhood. His specialty? “Servicing” geriatrics. In more ways that one!

But well, after the 1001th genital joke and woefully bad acting from everyone, including Sandler, I dozed off (just to spare myself the agony) when things were getting “exciting”: a Palestinian-Israeli “why can’t we all just get along” crusade against a big, bad American developer. At one point, I did care about the commentary it was trying to make about the Israel-Palestine wrangle. After the Mariah Carey cameo (do we really need to see more of her after Glitter?) my brain shut down.

Strangely, this movie that can be enjoyed by some, if the 30% “fresh” rating at Rottentomatoes.com is any indication. How such a feat is possible is a mystery that may never be solved. Empire Mag calls it a “strange, mostly enjoyable mix of big political questions and crude comedy” and gave it 3 stars, making it equals with quality shows like Iron Man, which it sacriligeously gave only 3 stars.

Needless to say, I’m definitely not that charitable to Zohan.

Rating: 0.5 stars. – There was a minute of amount of laughter generated.

By

Movie review: Rogue

This movie was so good that there were no media movie previews for it. (Yes, I’m being sarcastic.)

See, I kinda like cheesy movies. Which is why I watch every K-horror or J-Horror out there. I appreciate the simple adrenaline surge they provide.

So I expected some bloody, gory fun from Rogue, which is about a monstrous crocodile attacking some hapless tourists in the Australian outback.

It’s nice to see Vartan again – this time he’s an American travel writer named Pete, and he’s the hero. Sort of. But even the presence of Vartan cannot lift the story’s extremely mundane storyline out of the brackish waters of D-movie hell. Poor Vartan – he didn’t deserve to be here.

Yes, I did not expect this movie to give me a Merchant Ivory experience, but hello, if this is a movie about giant monster crocodiles, I expect to see said giant crocodile more often, okay? Also, hey, where’s the blood and torn limbs??

You can call me bloodthirsty – but when tourists just simply disappear – thanks to the simple camera trick of turning away from victim for one second to find him missing the next – I am damn dissapointed, ok? There’s no horror to the scene, no dramatic impact. Just: “Oh, he’s gone. Whoops.” The whole horror about a giant crocodile is the primordial fear of being eaten alive. If you can’t even muster up that scare, what’s the point?

It shows you how tiny the budget must’ve been for them to not even be able to afford tomato ketchup to add realism to the show.Tsk tsk.

The only good thing about Rogue is that it has nice Australian scenery. Someone call the Australian Tourism Board!

Now, if you want a crocodile movie, try Primeval instead. It outshines Rogue in the scare department, even if it beggers belief at certain moments.

The monster crocodile seems to be psychic, able to sniff out the victims wherever they are, even to the extend of snatching them when they’re supposedly “safe” on dry land, away from the river.

But hey, maybe that’s what it is: A psychic monster crocodile!

Bring on the popcorn.

By

Review: X-Files: I want to believe

Truly, I really wanted more for David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson.

Both are wonderful actors that, at times, seemed overwhelmed by their legendary cult status as the faces of Mulder and Scully, FBI agents who fight supernatural and alien forces.

I wanted them to ascend beyond their typecasting (which they’ve tried wriggling out of to small degrees of success, though I really didn’t expect to see that much of Duchovny in Californiacation).

But I’m not against them returning as Mulder and Scully, as long as, by golly,  they do it with a bang, so as to prove to the whole wide world and those who are not X-Files fans, that they’re more than capable actors.

Sadly, that’s not to be. Eventhough I really enjoyed Duchovny and Anderson’s return to form (how can we not go awww, when we realise how their relationship has deepened over the days when they were in the bureau?)

But the story? It’s got to be the lamest, weakest excuse of a story for a cinema movie ever. Spoilers ahead!

Read More

By

Review: Made of Honor

I remember it well. When Patrick Dempsey stepped into the interview room, neatly dressed in a black, smart casual suit, it was as if the air was suddenly electrified. I was supposed to interview Dempsey for the movie Enchanted, but all I could think about as he approached the table was, “OMG, he’s going to sit next to me!! Squee!!!”

It took a lot of iron will for me to be professional and not to melt into a puddle of goo when he smiled and greeted us journos, but Lord, he was so close, you know?

That’s Patrick Dempsey’s “it” factor, the effect he has on the ladies, no matter how rational we pride ourselves to be. Little wonder that he’s branching out into the romantic comedy/drama category. Girls wanna see more of that side of him. And movie moguls know that he has it in him to pull in the female demographic.

His recent offering, Made of Honor (or Honour, as it’s spelt in Malaysia), fits the bill, but is it any good? Here’s my review:

Read More

By

The Happening is happening (No spoilers)

Damn. Eyeris stole the headline of my post right out of my mind. Next time must type faster! If you’re wondering what in the world the headline means, it just means this: 85% of it is good.

With M.Night Shyamalan movies, the less you know about it before you watch it the better. When word circulated that it’s about “global warming”, I thought, “What the eff does it have to do with green house gasses?”

Well, it does make sense now. Especially since I did watch something about said phenomena. Oh yes sirree bub, it is true what they can do … but uhm, I’m going ahead of myself.

Since I’m probably one of 1% who liked Lady in the Water, the question, “Is M.Night Shyamalan going to bounce back with this one?” doesn’t really apply to me. But I will say, “Sure. He’s not going to be hot pockets like before, but he’s going to be out of the dog house for a bit.”

Read More